Systemic treatment approaches in her2-negative advanced breast cancer-guidance on the guidelines.

Despite advancements in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer, many patients still develop disease recurrence; others present with de novo metastatic disease. For most patients with advanced breast cancer, the primary treatment intent is noncurative-that is, palliative-in nature. The goals of treatment should therefore focus on maximizing symptom control and extending survival. Treatments should be evaluated on an individualized basis in terms of evidence, but also with full respect for the wishes of the patient in terms of acceptable toxicity. Given the availability of extensive reviews on the roles of endocrine therapy and her2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)-targeted therapies for advanced disease, we focus here mainly on treatment guidelines for the non-endocrine management of her2-negative advanced breast cancer in a Canadian health care context.

Use and delivery of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy-single-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (g-csf) as primary prophylaxis against chemotherapy-induced neutropenia has significant cost implications. We examined use of g-csf for early-stage breast cancer patients at our centre. The study also examined the pattern of nurse-led patient teaching with respect to drug self-administration. METHODS: Patients who received g-csf between November 2009 and October 2010 were identified from pharmacy records. After consent had been obtained, electronic charts were examined to extract data on chemotherapy and use of g-csf. Patients were contacted by telephone to obtain information on the utilization of home-care nursing visits for g-csf administration. RESULTS: The study analyzed 36 patients. Median age was 58 years (range: 31-78 years). Of the 36 patients, 30 (83%) had received adjuvant treatment, and 6 (17%), neoadjuvant treatment. Most patients (71%) received 10 days (range: 7-10 days) of filgrastim. Of the 36 patients, 29 (81%) received g-csf as primary prophylaxis. In 90% of those patients, primary prophylaxis commenced with the taxane component of treatment. Of the 36 patients, 7 (19%) received g-csf after neutropenia, including 2 who had febrile neutropenia. In 96% of the patients, injections were received at home with the help of a nurse; those patients were subsequently taught self-injection techniques. The median number of nursing visits was 2 (range: 1-3 visits). Most patients were satisfied with the home care and g-csf teaching they received. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the g-csf used in breast cancer treatment during the study period was given for primary prophylaxis. A major reason for the decision to use g-csf appears to have been physician-perceived risk of febrile neutropenia. Delivery of g-csf by home-care nurses was well received by patients.

Phase ii trial of a metronomic schedule of docetaxel and capecitabine with concurrent celecoxib in patients with prior anthracycline exposure for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase ii clinical trial examined the activity of a metronomic dosing schedule of docetaxel and capecitabine chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer. Patients also received daily oral celecoxib in an effort to improve outcome measures and to ameliorate some of the common side effects of chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients received docetaxel at a starting dose of 15 mg/m² weekly, oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m² once daily, and oral celecoxib 200 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit: percentage of patients experiencing either an objective response or stable disease (sd) for more than 6 months. In the absence of significant neutropenia, the dose of docetaxel was escalated after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. Therapy was given until disease progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. The level of thymidine phosphorylase expression in peripheral white blood cells of patients was measured before and during treatment to determine the effect on this capecitabine-activating enzyme. RESULTS: Of 47 patients enrolled, 38 (81%) completed treatment to a disease endpoint. No complete responses were achieved, but 13 of the 38 patients (34%) experienced a partial response, and another 3 patients (8%) experienced sd for more than 6 months. The clinical benefit rate was therefore 42% (95% confidence interval: 27% to 57%). The median time to disease progression for all evaluable patients was 3.6 months (range: 0.9-21.7 months). The most common nonhematologic toxicities were diarrhea, plantar- palmar erythrodysesthesia, fatigue, mucositis, and vomiting. Most patients (89%) received combination chemotherapy until disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that metronomic docetaxel-capecitabine chemotherapy with daily celecoxib can produce significant anticancer activity, with predictable toxicity. Efficacy fell short of expectations, with outcome measures being similar to those obtained when the study agents are given in conventional dosing. Furthermore, there is mounting evidence to indicate that a low dose of taxanes fails to induce thymidine phosphorylase expression, an effect believed to be important in achieving therapeutic synergism when taxanes are given concurrently with capecitabine.

Vascular endothelial growth factor activity after switching of bisphosphonate treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recent data have shown a fall in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) concentrations after bisphosphonate (BP) treatment in BP-naïve patients. It has therefore been proposed that BPs may have in vivo anti-VEGF effects. AIMS: To explore whether VEGF concentrations change after administration of a more potent BP in patients receiving long-term BP treatment. METHODS: 31 patients with breast cancer who had progressive metastatic bone disease despite treatment with early-generation BPs were switched to zoledronic acid. Serum VEGF concentrations were measured at baseline, and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12. RESULTS: VEGF concentration per platelet count did not change significantly at any time during the 12 weeks after treatment with zoledronic acid. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to zoledronic acid did not suppress circulating serum VEGF concentrations in BP-pretreated patients. Novel approaches to assess the effect of BPs on the bone milieu may provide further insight into the possible antiangiogenic properties of BPs.

Does confirmatory tumor biopsy alter the management of breast cancer patients with distant metastases?

BACKGROUND: Decisions about systemic treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer are often based on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and Her2 status of the primary tumor. This study prospectively investigated concordance in receptor status between primary tumor and distant metastases and assessed the impact of any discordance on patient management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biopsies of suspected metastatic lesions were obtained from patients and analyzed for ER/PgR and Her2. Receptor status was compared for metastases and primary tumors. Questionnaires were completed by the oncologist before and after biopsy to determine whether the biopsy results changed the treatment plan. RESULTS: Forty women were enrolled; 35 of them underwent biopsy, yielding 29 samples sufficient for analysis; 3/29 biopsies (10%) showed benign disease. Changes in hormone receptor status were observed in 40% (P = 0.003) and in Her2 status in 8% of women. Biopsy results led to a change of management in 20% of patients (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study demonstrates the presence of substantial discordance in receptor status between primary tumor and metastases, which led to altered management in 20% of cases. Tissue confirmation should be considered in patients with clinical or radiological suspicion of metastatic recurrence.

Pre-menopausal breast cancer and aromatase inhibitors: Treating a new generation of women.

Aromatase inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of post-menopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer. However, approximately 22% of all cases of breast cancer in North America are diagnosed in women below the age of 50 and a substantial proportion of these women are pre-menopausal. In the pre-menopausal population with hormone receptor positive disease, research on the use of aromatase inhibitors is only beginning to emerge. In this review, the mechanism of action of aromatase inhibitors and the history of endocrine treatment for pre-menopausal breast cancer is briefly presented. Available research to date regarding efficacy and toxicity of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of pre-menopausal breast cancer and future research directions are also discussed.

Using aromatase inhibitors in the neoadjuvant setting: evolution or revolution?

Despite improvements in the management of patients with early breast cancer, the prognosis for women with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remains poor. The potential goals of neoadjuvant treatment for this disease include down-sizing tumours to allow breast conservation as well as the possibility of improving survival rates. Neoadjuvant treatment was initially dominated by chemotherapy, which increased rates of breast conserving surgery, but to date has demonstrated no survival benefit over standard adjuvant chemotherapy. With recent advances in endocrine therapy, and rapid and routine assessment of predictive factors of response such as estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and Her2 nu receptor status, endocrine therapy has come to the forefront of research investigating a neoadjuvant alternative to chemotherapy. Early studies of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy mainly evaluated the role of tamoxifen in the treatment of elderly postmenopausal women with LABC who were unselected for ER/PR status and were unsuitable for either surgery or chemotherapy. Response rates in these patients were found to be inferior to those traditionally obtained from trials with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Paralleling the superiority that third-generation aromatase inhibitors have shown over tamoxifen in the metastatic and adjuvant settings however, AIs have also demonstrated superiority in the neoadjuvant setting. Recent studies have shown response rates for neoadjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors in carefully selected hormone receptor positive patients to be comparable to those seen with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This is particularly important as hormone receptor positive tumours have repeatedly been shown to have lower response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy than hormone receptor negative tumours. Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment with aromatase inhibitors has therefore evolved from being an experimental effort to palliate women with LABC unsuitable for surgery or chemotherapy, to representing a viable and possibly preferred alternative for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive large tumours or LABC. Further benefits of neoadjuvant trials include allowing the study of predictive biomarkers of disease in order to provide insight into therapy resistance and sensitivity, and identifying promising systemic therapies for additional testing in larger adjuvant trials.

Heterogeneity of O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase expression in human breast tumours.

An important determinant of cellular resistance to chemotherapeutic O6-alkylating agents, which comprise methylating and chloroethylating agents, is the ability of cells to repair alkylation damage at the O6-position of guanine in DNA. This is achieved by a specific DNA repair enzyme O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase. In this study O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase expression was measured in human breast tumours using both biochemical and immunohistochemical techniques. O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase activity was then compared with known clinical prognostic indices to assess the potential role of O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase in predicting the behaviour of this common malignancy. The application of both biochemical and immunohistochemical techniques was feasible and practical. Most breast tumours expressed high levels of O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase. Immunohistochemical analysis showed marked variation in expression not only between individuals but also within individual tumours, and in the same patient, between metastases and between primary tumour and metastatic site. O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase activity in tissue extracts significantly correlated not only with immunohistochemical staining intensity determined by subjective quantitation, but also with measures of protein levels using a computerised image analysis system including mean grey (P<0.001), percentage of cells positive for O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase (P<0.001), and integrated optical density (P<0.001). O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase expression did not correlate with any of the established clinical prognostic indicators for current treatment regimens. However, immunohistochemical offers a rapid and convenient method for assessing potential utility of O6-alkylating agents or O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase inactivating agents in future studies of breast cancer treatment.

Randomised phase II trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (DOXIL/CAELYX) versus doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: a study by the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group.

CAELYX/DOXIL, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, has shown antitumour activity and reduced toxicity compared with standard doxorubicin in other tumour types. In this prospective randomised trial, 94 eligible patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) were treated, 50 with CAELYX (50 mg/m(2) by a 1 h intravenous (i.v.) infusion every 4 weeks) and 44 with doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2) by an i.v. bolus every 3 weeks). Histological subtypes were evenly matched, 33% were leiomyosarcoma (CAELYX: 18; doxorubicin: 13). Primary disease sites were well matched. CAELYX was significantly less myelosuppressive, only 3 (6%) patients had grade 3 and 4 neutropenia, versus 33 (77%) on doxorubicin; febrile neutropenia occurred in 7 (16%) patients given doxorubicin, but only 1 (2%) given CAELYX. 37 (86%) patients on doxorubicin had grade 2-3 alopecia, but only 3 (6%) on CAELYX, and the major toxicity with CAELYX was to the skin. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia with CAELYX was grade 1: 4 (8%) patients, grade 2: 11 (22%) patients, grade 3: 9 (18%) patients and grade 4: 1 (2%) patient. Other non-haematological grade 3 and 4 toxicities were rare. Confirmed responses were observed with both agents: CAELYX: complete response (CR) 1 (uterine), partial response (PR) 4 (response rate (RR) 10%); and doxorubicin: CR 1, PR 3 (RR of 9%); with the best response being stable disease (NC) in 16 and 18 patients, respectively. The reason for the low response rate is unknown, but it may be due partly to a high proportion of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. In conclusion, CAELYX has equivalent activity to doxorubicin in STS with an improved toxicity profile and should be considered for further investigation in combination with other agents such as ifosfamide.

Treatment outcome and prognostic factors for relapse after high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell rescue for patients with poor risk high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The aim of the study was to determine treatment outcome and identify a particularly high risk group in a consecutive series of 66 patients with poor prognosis high grade lymphoma (NHL) treated with conventional induction chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) rescue. Fifty-one patients with intermediate grade NHL (Kiel) and two or three adverse prognostic features as defined by the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI) received induction treatment with 7 weeks of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, bleomycin, etoposide, prednisolone and methotrexate (VAPEC-B) followed by three cycles of ifosfamide/cytarabine. Fifteen patients with high grade Burkitt's and lymphoblastic NHL received 11 weeks of VAPEC-B followed by three cycles of high-dose methotrexate. HDCT for all 66 patients consisted of busulphan/cyclophosphamide followed by autologous PBSC rescue. Thirty-one patients (47%) received HDCT in first complete remission (CR/CRu) and 34 patients (52%) in first partial remission (PR) after conventional chemotherapy. Following HDCT, 42 patients (64%) were in CR/CRu, 19 patients (29%) in PR and one patient had progressive disease. There were four toxic deaths. After a median follow-up period of 27 months (range 7-73) in 46 surviving patients, the actuarial 3-year estimates of overall survival, event-free survival (EFS) and freedom from progression (FFP) were 67%, 65% and 70%, respectively. In univariate analysis, prognostic factors associated with reduced EFS were mediastinal bulk (P = 0.02), > or = 3 extra-nodal sites (P = 0.02), remission status prior to HDCT (P = 0.05), low albumin (P = 0.08) and raised ESR (P = 0.09). No significant difference was observed between patients with intermediate or high grade NHL or between patients with two or three adverse IPI features. Multivariate analysis identified mediastinal bulk (P = 0.01), > or = 3 extra-nodal sites (P = 0.01) and low albumin (P = 0.03) as joint predictors of poor EFS. Remission status prior to HDCT was not found to be significantly associated with reduced EFS, FFP or survival, suggesting early introduction of HDCT may benefit patients with a PR. Based on these three adverse features, three groups (0, 1 or > or = 2 features) could be identified with differing EFS, survival and freedom from progression (FFP) rates at 3 years; 85%, 63% and 20%, respectively for EFS, 84%, 64% and 25% for survival and 85%, 66% and 33%, respectively for FFP. This prognostic model may identify patients with a particularly poor prognosis despite HDCT, who may benefit from other therapeutic approaches.

A randomized phase-II study of BB-10010 (macrophage inflammatory protein- 1alpha) in patients with advanced breast cancer receiving 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.

BB-10010 is a variant of the human form of macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha (MIP-1alpha), which has been shown in mice to block the entry of hematopoietic stem cells into S-phase and to increase their self-renewal capacity during recovery from cytotoxic damage. Its use may constitute a novel approach for protecting the quality of the stem cell population and its capacity to regenerate after periods of cytotoxic treatment. Thirty patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were entered into the first randomized, parallel group controlled phase II study. This was designed to evaluate the potential myeloprotective effects of a 7-day regimen of BB-10010 administered to patients receiving six cycles of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) chemotherapy. Patients were randomized, 10 receiving 100 microgram/kg BB-10010, 11 receiving 30 microgram/kg BB-10010, and nine control patients receiving no BB-10010. BB-10010 was well-tolerated in all patients with no severe adverse events related to the drug. Episodes of febrile neutropenia complicated only 4% of the treatment cycles and there was no difference in incidence between the treated and nontreated groups. Studies to assess the generation of progenitor cells in long-term bone marrow cultures were performed immediately preceding chemotherapy and at the end of six dosing cycles in 18 patients. Circulating neutrophils, platelets, CD 34(+) cells, and granulocyte/macrophage colony-forming cell (GM-CFC) levels were determined at serial time points in cycles 1, 3, and 6. The results showed similar hemoglobin and platelet kinetics in all three groups. On completion of the six treatment cycles, the average pretreatment neutrophil levels were reduced from 5.3 to 1.7 x 10(9)/L in the control patients and from 4.3 to 1.9 and 4.5 to 2.5 x 10(9)/L in the 30/100 microgram/kg BB-10010 groups, respectively. Relative to their pretreatment values, 50% of the patients receiving BB-10010 completed the treatment with neutrophil values significantly higher than any of the controls (P = .02). Mobilization of GM-CFC was enhanced by BB-10010 with an additional fivefold increase over that generated by chemotherapy alone, giving a maximal 25-fold increase over pretreatment values. Bone marrow progenitor assays before and after this standard regimen of chemotherapy indicated little long-term cumulative impairment to recovery from chemotherapy. Despite the limited cumulative damage to the bone marrow, which may have minimized the protective value of BB-10010 during this regimen of chemotherapy, better recovery of neutrophils in the later treatment cycles with BB-10010 was indicated in a number of patients.

Citrobacter freundii and fatal neutropenic enterocolitis following adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Neutropenic enterocolitis is increasingly being recognized as a life-threatening complication of chemotherapy, mainly for haematological and lymphoproliferative malignancies. It is under-recognized clinically, with the diagnosis often being made on post-mortem examination. Although active medical management is generally preferred, surgical intervention may be indicated. We report a case of fatal neutropenic enterocolitis, secondary to Citrobacter freundii, following adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. We also review the literature, examining the aetiology, diagnosis and management of this often fatal entity.

Long-term control of polycythemia rubra vera with recombinant alpha interferon.

The natural history of PRV is characterized by a prolonged period of myeloproliferation chiefly affecting the red cell series. It can be controlled by venesection and cytotoxic agents. In this case report the patient declined further 'standard' chemotherapy to control his disease and the use of relatively low doses of IFN-a was successful in our patient in controlling myeloproliferation and stabilizing the disease over a prolonged period. These results support the use of IFN-a, not only as a means of myelosuppression in PRV but also as an agent with the potential to prevent disease progression.